History and Philosophy of Caodaism - 6/8 (Gabriel Gobron)


The explanation of the campaign conducted against Caodaism is found in the obstruction that gives rise to the reformed religion the number of faithful which is in Cochinchina, for instance, more than one million out of three million and a half inhabitants.

The former governor of Cochinchina Blanchard de la Brosse is now
exposed to public opprobrium for having declared practicable, and authorized this religion in the territory under his jurisdiction.But the alarm is given and a crusade is launched against the heretics.

Since then, great progress toward understanding has been accomplished, and Caodaism is on the way to becoming the official religion of the new State of Vietnam.

Le Cygne (Bạch-Nga, Hànội) published a series of articles: The true visage of Caodaism (9-36), from which we shall cite only the most curious passages.It was the title indicates an objective report.We can’t pay a better compliment to it, for the truth is also God’s service.

“Let my dear readers be assured! Instead of pulling a long face in reading the subject of this inquiry, looking me up and down with an astonished or skeptical or mocking eye, murmuring imprecations against me, let them listen calmly to the confessions of a man who, like them, and nearly all Tonkinese intellectuals, has willingly ridiculized a religion newly born in his own country, simply because he has understood nothing of it.“Newly born” is not quite the word; following the Caodaist calendar, Humanity is in the year of the 3rd Amnesty of God in the Orient; it is then ten years ago that this religion came into its own.

An experienced sociologist must notice that since the first quarter of this century, Vietnam has undergone an abrupt shock.There has been a complete overthrow of the destiny of people, its thought and faith.The return of two Phan’s announced the first symptom of that fever which increases daily.From a political point of view, that is revolution in all minds and hearts.From an economic point of view, it is the intensive development of industry, the formation of cooperatives and syndicates.From a literary point of view, the radical reform of the language, the introduction of new concepts in Poetry and Art, and as for the domain of religion, the birth of a new faith.”

To the rebuke that Caodaism would be constituted only by ignorant and superstitious masses, skillfully shorn by swindlers and charlatans, this reply:
The thousands of Caodaist believers are not all credulous or superstitious persons.A great number of those who practice the new religion in Cochinchina, in Tonkin, in China, and in France, are intellectuals of the upper class, teachers, lawyers, writers, journalists, deputies.It is not without reasonthat Caodaism caused many to make mention of it throughout the world, that several famous reviews of Paris, London, Lisbon, Warsaw, even of Rome and of Buenos-Aires have started to study its dogma and doctrine. The author of this inquiry has had the rare privilege of ransacking the archives of the Holy See of Tây-Ninh where he could read letters and precious documents, bulletins of conversion addressed to the Pope by foreign personalities from different capitals of Europe and America.Even Japan, a country proud of its Bushido, has sent scholars to Tay-Ninh trying to understand what is this new faith which has shaken the world’s opinion”.

La Vérité (The Truth), also, made a report (May 11, 13, 38) that was later put out in pamphlet form (special edition of this daily of PhnomPenh) and from which we note the following extract :
" During the twelve years in which Caodaism has developed in Indochina, it is to be noticed that no serious objective study has yet been consecrated to it,However this social and religious movement touches hundreds of thousands of human beings on an ever widening scale.The new religion feeling itself cramped within the limits of its cradle, Cochinchina, has sent its missionaries to Cambodia, to Annam and to Tonkin, where it flatters itself with some success.

It has its temple in Paris, and ambition soon to bring the good word as far as China, Siam, India and Europe.

The Vietnamese pride is thus expressed unexpectedly in a field of action that was unknown to Giao-Chi’s descendants.They brought nothing to human thought.Why?Mystery.
The Caodaism seems to despise the enigma so put, for it pretends to the dignity of religion at the same level as Buddhism.Moreover, is it not called Reformed Buddhism:

This ambition alone of the new faith that counts, it is said, millions of followers among which many intellectuals, induces us to study Caodaism carefully,Obeying today to the injunctions of friends, we have decided to present to the waiting public some truths bout the new doctrine, some observations and objective analyses”.
La Vérité (The Truth)

In the preface of the pamphlet, the author adds these considerations:
“Some have loosed on the spiritist origins of the Caodaism much easy irony; they have tried to clothe off by ridicule, divine messages transmitted by the turning tables and the billed-basket.

What is there then surprising, unexpected, in the eternal truth borrowing that vehicle instead of making itself heard on a Sinai surrounded with lightning and thunder, or expressing itself by the voice of inspired prophets or marvelous apparitions.

Do not the efforts of a medium elected to that mission, as noble as any, isn’t it at all so legitimate, offer as many guarantees as any voice chosen until the present to help Heaven to communicate with Earth?

As for the persecutions of which Caodaism has been the object and of which the era is perhaps not closed, may we not see therein the better proof of its celestial origin and its supernatural character?All religions preaching like it justice and goodness, founded like it on sacrifice and love, have known the hostility of man, the rancour of the powerful, the anger and reprobation of all those whose satisfied egos they came to trouble, whose authority they shook, whose pride and tyranny they combatted.

To be persecutor or persecuted, to dominate by force or to be a victim of violence, to impose faith by arms or to accept martyrdom, there is not, in all history, other alternative for growing religions.Had Caodaism any choice? Its only weapon is gentleness.It could oppose to its enemies, but its resignation and confidence in the final triumph of justice; it could, on submitting itself to the laws, but proclaim, without weakening, its invincible attachment to the truth come from Above; it could only endeavor to prove, by its firmness and constance, the authenticity of its divine mission.That is what it has done.

And its persecutors have been forced to bow before such heroic and quiet courage, to recognize its right to life, to grant it freedom, the only favor it claims.

Victorious over force, now disarmed, it remains to Caodaism to conquer the misunderstanding of men, their blindness, their skepticism,These are redoubtable enemies.

The other religions, of which it is the synthesis, have already confronted them.They have succeeded:Why shouldn’t it, too, succeed?

Of what we can reproach it?Too much good faith, too much sincerety, too much tolerance?Is it for proposing an ideal too broadly, too fraternally human that we might reproach it?

Is it at all contradictory in that fusion of diverse religions, each keeping, of its primitive faith, the essence and what forms for all a kind of common fund, that it must find means to make fraternity and the universal peace reign over mankind?Here is how the Supreme Master, in one of his messages, explains the necessity of that fusion:

“Formerly, the peoples did not know one another and lacked means of transport: I then founded at different epochs, five branches of the Great Way:Confucianism, The Worship of Genii, Christianism, Taoism, Buddhism, each based on the customs of the race called particularly to apply them.

“Nowadays, all parts of the world are exploited; people knowing each other better, aspire to a real peace.But because of the very multiplicity of those religions, men do notalways live in harmony one with another,That is why I decided to unite all those religions into one to bring them to the primordial unity.

“Moreover, the holy doctrine of those religions has been, through centuries, more and more denatured by those who have been charged to spread, up to such a point that I have now firmly resolved to come myself, to show you the way”.

It is then the whole world that now is offered to the apostolate of Caodaism, heir of the antique doctrines that have already conquered the quasi-unanimity of men.

The task shall be hard, for, as says the message we have just read, men have forgotten the very principles of the doctrines, which they pretend to profess.They have sometimes conserved the letter; but have more often lost the spirit.

The task shall be hard, for though the land where the missionaries must go to prepare the mission is no longer tillable, it is full of parasitic and poisonous plants as vigorous and such solidly rooted as if all the evil human passions served them for manure.

Never was the need more felt of reminding men that they all are sons of one Father and that the horrible fratricidal struggles, to which they gave themselves up yesterday, to which they are ready to submit tomorrow, shall cause the ruin and the sorrow not only of themselves, but of their children, and their children’s children.

Caodaism is a synonym of peace, fraternity, love.May the millions of the believers it shall some day count, and may that soon, remember to inspire their conduct by the eternal maxim, that is found in the books of the Masters of all times, in which are summed up all science and all wisdom: “Love one another”.

What is the point of view of the caodaist Sacerdocy on this report: it is La Vérité (The Truth) gives it to us.

“Our objective inquiry communicated to the orthodox Church of Caodaism has earned from its greatest Chief, the Superior Phạm Công Tắc, the charming letter from which we cite below and excerpt concerning the relation of the Đại-Đạo to Minh Ly movement.

Our readers understand by this simple letter the broad tolerance of the Caodaist spirit, which rejects no belief on account of its non-conformity or its non-orthodoxy.Such an attitude honours the Caodaists, notwithstanding all other social and philosophical considerations.

Ed. Note
Phạm-Công-Tắc, Superior of Caodaism or Reformed Buddhism, Holy See at Tây-Ninh, to the Director of La Vérité, PhnomPenh.
Mr. Director,

“The Caodaist Sacerdocy and I are deeply touched by your high token of sympathy toward our religion:We have read your report with interest,Further, it is the only organ that has courageously defended our cause since the beginning,We can say that it is our friend.This report is interesting from any point of view, save some little errors of documentation of which we beg you to be so kind as to grant us hearing.

“Caodaism does not spring from the Minh Lý movement.We recognize that the Minh-Lý was organized before us, but it is separated from us by mystic and philosophical point of view.The truth is that the Vietnamese spiritualist movement came into being spontaneously with the help of no foreign concept, doctrine or dogma.It was unforeseeable.We can say that it was almost miraculous. As if led by an invisible power, the manifestation is latent. Moreover, this movement has felt in all the world,All the spiritualist organizations that were created after the war were perhaps born of that unknown power.

“As for the Caodaists, a group of intellectuals gathered to search for the possibility of harmonizing the two civilizations, the Oriental and the Occidental.

“They have tried in this case to bring close the two philosophies:Christianity and Confucianism.The attempt is so encouraging by reason of the high morality of the great thinkers who thus converge toward the Good and the Beautiful.There exists then a spot where ideas can meet and thus thoughts be united.Knowing this, the group of Vietnamese intellectuals took steps to prepare a field of mutual understanding.They have had the satisfaction to see that great ideas can no longer separate thinkers of the human race.Morals are one, it is only practise that differs.Here is to them an obstacle or a catch.The power to act is not within the reach of common men such as they.It is above their reach,A bit of slowing down was seen in the Caodaist movement,These intellectuals seek for a way: unity of faith and practise of all religions.

“Without my describing it, you can guess the value of an attempt.

One of their friends came from France in the person of Captain Monnet. He is a spiritist.He took interest in the research of these intellectuals, but friendly understanding in the practise of all religious faiths escaped from him too.He advised them to consult the Spirits.That is to say they have had recourse to the help of The Beyond to solve their difficulties. The first spiritist communication, given by the Spirits, in the form of counsel, gives them the key to the enigma.

“The conclusion is this: Faith derives from the Conscience. The Conscience is impossible of subordination.It differs according to the state of the spirit of each individual. It is impersonal and inalienable, because it is God’s emanation (the universal Conscience).So, a liberty of conscience for all human beings is proclaimed, but union in the spirit of the Beautiful and the Good is obligatory, from which was born the Caodaist doctrine:the doctrine of broad tolerance.

One might say that Caodaism is a purely philosophical religion, whereas the Minh-ly is a body that limits itself to a cultural practice of the three Oriental religions:Buddhism, Taoism, and Confucianism, mixed a little with hypnotical mysticism.

It is a friend to Caodaism in its social manifestation, but it is not a blood brother.

We hope to be able to meet it in the practise of the Beautiful and the Good of which we make an apostolate of propaganda”.
Signed: Phạm-Công-Tắc.
And here is one of the famous spiritualistic seances at the beginning of Caodaism:

It was in 1926, I was living in an apartment of the Audouit building, now become the Huỳnh-Đình-Khiêm building,At my home, there came in and out young boys and girls, students, republicans,progressionists and revolutionary militants.

One Sunday morning, an unknown young man came into my office, took a seat opposite me and blurted out, without ceremony, these words which, however, did not astonish me:I have been, in fact, accustomed to this kind of visit and proposition.

-My dear friend, if you like, we are going to strike up a friendship to study philosophy and politics together.You know, no doubt, better than I, what relation these two activities have to each other.

In the feverish social and political atmosphere in which we lived at that time, which seems already strangely distant, I did not wonder either to read on my caller’s card: Vietnamese Revolutionist.

On the evening of the day before appearing for the examination for the first part of his B.A., this good boy was expelled from school.His crime? To have written to Mr. Cognacq, at that time Governor of Cochinchina, to protest against a certain speech of his.Since that moment, this student had set himself to read enormously; to steep himself in various philosophical systems; to be convinced of the necessity of revolution.To manifest in his new faith, he did not hesitate to have his calling cards printed as I have showed above ...

The fanatics of my friend type were so numerous that I didn’t suspect him to be a provocateur.Later I found that my new friend was highly educated; that he was versed in spiritualistic philosophies and that “spiritism” interested him particularly.That is how I was led to know the movement of turning tables and medium communications.One evening in November, my friend was reminding me for the Nth time of the marvels of turning tables, which he had learned from the works of some promoters of French Spiritism, now departed, Allan Kardec and Léon Denis.I threw out a categorical challenge as to the veracity of these phenomena, defying to attempt an experiment. He brought me at once to some authentic chiefs of an occult school at that time newly born, the later activities of which were to have a great influence on the formation and development of Caodaism: his school was called Minh-lý Đạo, which may be literally translated: The Way of Enlightened Reason.

I hasten to acknowledge that I was placed in the presence of extremely kind and honest men.They were bumble employees in administration and business, eager for self-improvement and rising in society thanks to their continued efforts,They were ten who gathered in a kind of coterie to discuss spiritualistic philosophies, and then when the theories were well assimilated to a new canon they created themselves, with a view to venerating their saints and sages.

I was very surprised at their broad spiritualistic learning.They all were capable of citing from me entire passages of the greatest works of the spiritists.Better than their French Masters, they had the audacity to use Henri Durville, the renowned occultist, in their pursuit of truth.

That is how one of the leaders, Mr. Xứng, kindly inaugurated the author’s relationship with his group by a hypnotic experience.I confess, however, that I found in it nothing truly conclusive.

After having me shut my eyes, he made various movements in the air with their two broad hands all around my head without ever touching it.After a quarter of an hour of this hypnotic preparation, he ordered me with a clear and caressing voice to incline my head in a certain direction, or to make certain gestures with my arms, which I did without difficulty.

The spectators who were members of the group and my friend X were visibly satisfied with the experience:As I insisted on attending a seance of some importance, Mr. Âu-Kích, the most esteemed of the group, prepared it.

On a table used as an altar, he had nine candles placed triangularly:He then explained to me that the figure nine as well as the geometrical placement imply the number three (three angles in a triangle, actually) and have a symbolic importance, that only the initiate can understand.Then began the ceremony of offerings.The members of the group prostrated themselves before the altar, the chief, Mr.Âu-Kích placing himself in the middle.They recited prayers, the recognized themes of various Asiatic religions.Besides, their catechism does not hide the fact that their philosophy is a synthesis of the Buddhist, Confucianist and Taoist religions.But here it was suddenly, that the chief drew strange movements in space with his right arm.All fell silent as if by magic.- X. whispered in my ear that the “Spirits” were going to make communication through Mr.Âu-Kích.

In fact, the latter having seized a big pencil which had been placed beforehand on a small table with some paper, set to transcribe the divine words, his eyes closed.They explained to me that he was the preferred “medium” of great spirits; venerated by the faithful, which the Bodisatva Quan Âm had dedicated to me through the chief of the group.I was, in fact, very proud to learn that during my “former existences” I had accomplished great works, and I was “exiled in this valley of tears” only to atone for the crime of pride of which I was guilty.I should have been an unbearably proud man “in the course of my successive existences”.

This my friends believe in mediumnity, that is to say in communications with the “Beyond” and consequently in the survival of the soul.Differing from the Catholics, they do not speak of eternal hell, but about transmigration of the soul, which, by leaving the physical body, may live in other earths than ours. In this, they resemble the Buddhists, with, however, this important restriction: whereas Shakyamuni’s disciples admit that a human soul may come back to earth and live in the body of a beast.Minh-Lý’s followers, more modern, reject this hypothesis.In their new faith, the law of attraction replaces, in very unexpected fashion, the Buddhist transmigration of the soul. It is unnecessary then to have the wicked come back to this earthly life in the skin of a pig or a dog to atone for past faults.This would be moreover presenting the Author of Creation asto cruel a judge.No, the law of attraction, that plays in space, suffices for celestial justice.Such, who through a life of sacrifices should be “deified” after death, thanks to the attraction, arrive at a superior world in space.On the contrary, the wicked, the selfish “shall fall themselves”, after their departure from the earth, into a planet whose conditions of existence are still more painful.All this is done naturally, automatically, “as it were”:

Though these latter lines are not very clear, or are disputable from a Latin spiritualistic point of view (the Anglo-saxon spiritism does not admit of a return to the earth, but of progress in spheres of space), let us come to the “utility” of Caodaism:

“Nevertheless with the triumph of capitalism, the old Cochinchinese patriarchal economic structure was broken down.The Gia-Long Code which recognized only the collective personality of the village and the family, thoroughly anti-individualistic, was abolished or almost so, in Cochinchina, where the individual freedom recognized more or less by the modified codes is the cause of the discard of Confucianism.After all, the latter has really constituted a religion with its Canon, its clergy, its temples, and not just a morality.

It is clear that under these conditions, a father’s authority as well as that of a husband or a landowner, could be more threatened in Cochinchina than in other parts of Vietnam where the Gia-long Code and Confucianism still retain their glory power. That is, in my opinion, the only reason why there was room in our twenty Cochinchinese provinces for the birth of a new faith.

If the Shakyamuni doctrine can be subdivided into two great schools:that of the Greater Vehicle also called “Northern” which comprises in Indochina the Vietnamese Buddhist population, and that of the Lesser Vehicle or “Southern”, which influences Cambodia and Laos, why should it not be able to take upon itself the modern form of Caodaism?

We pass by all that is connected with the persecutions in this pamphlet.

Concerning the future of Caodaism, two remarks:
1) Whatever one may say about Confucianism, it was the “national religion” of China and Vietnam.In these countries, the spiritual and the temporal powers are joined in one man’s hand, the Emperor’s, the Son of Heaven, consequently, master of soul and body of his subjects.To have religion, there must be temples of worship or churches; a canon; clergy.These conditions have been met by the “Nho” Doctrine.The temple of worship, is it the paternal house itself.While the “four classics” and the “five canons” sum up the catechism of the “Saint of the land of Lo” (Confucius).The clergy was a society of men of letters who, in fact, held both powers, spiritual and temporal, with, as a kind of Pope, the Emperor, the Son of Heaven.

The development of capitalism in Cochinchina with its consequent abrogation that favours individualism to the detriment of Confucian collectivism, undermined favourable conditions to the survival of the religion of the sages.It is thus, historically, that the dawn of new religious sects, and particularly of Caodaism, must be explained.

2) It is characteristic in our century of international capitalism, this religious Reform of ours is contemporary with an Asiatic movement of the same essence, the same historic mission.For, in Japan and China, the tormented elements of the feudal bourgeoisie seek to create a social superstructure by founding a thousand and one modern neo-buddhist sects,The Caodaists and Minhlyists of our country will profit by comparing their doctrines with those of the Japanese and Chinese Reforms.

I add that the Minh-lý was but a new sect among many other sects that grew like mushrooms.But it represented the sect the most disciplined, the most educated from a philosophical point of view, and which possessed a theory wholly expressed in its catechism.

In spite of the simplicity with which the doctrine of Buddhism is exposed, it does not seem to us that this work and especially the philosophy which he attempts to bring within the scope of the average intelligence, can deeply penetrate the European masses, the principle of the “non-self” and that of causality, as conceived by the Buddhists being found, for the Occidental mentality, too much in opposition to the conception of the majority, that will always prefer to cast upon that entity, under the name of “Destiny”, the responsibility of their sufferings, rather than acknowledge “the natural harvest of grain sown ”.That which, in Mr. Entai Tomomatsu’s work, seemed able to retain our attention most particularly is, besides Buddha’s psychology, to which the author restores his profoundly human sense, the statement of the attempt made by certain Japanese intellectuals to bring Buddhism back to its original nobility by freeing it from the conceptions of certain interested sects, which, for believers, prayer, meditation with crossed legs and especially offerings, constitute the essential.

That movement, to which we cannot help giving all our sympathy and which relies on the fact that Buddha, since his satori (illumination) always attached more punyas (merits) to the social act than to the most earnest prayer, the most severe mortification, that movement, even if it must remain purely Asiatic, is yet worthy to be known by us, for, permitting the adaptation of Buddhism to the practical life, it could be very heavy with consequences in the whole world.

And if we consider that no text exists, facilitating the knowledge of Buddhism, we must thank Mr. Entai Tomomatsu and his faithful translator for having given us that work by way of introduction to the study of a philosophy able, so says the author, to penetrate not only into an epoch, but all epochs.

The opposition breaks out, still more brutally, in such an echo as this:The secrets of the “Mahatmas” in Brazil.

While the Bulletin des Amitiés Spirituelles (No 40, page 17) sets itself to depreciate the “faith” of the “superhumans” and to reduce them to proud little Luciferians compartmented in a corner of the Created and wishing to dethrone God (sic), Pensamento, Saint Paul’s great initiatic review, passes in review the faculties developed by those “initiates” despised by Sedir (p.396) and his christic sect.

1) Possibility of entering into relations with the planetary beings of the solar system;
2) Our cosmos has no more secrets for them because of their internal vision;
3) Knowledge of the future;
4) Possibilities of acting on matter;
5) Transmission of sound to great distance;
6) Limited influence upon the actions of other men;
7) Reading of others’ thoughts;
8) Spontaneous understanding of all languages;
9) Possibility of prolongation of the physical life (Elixir of a long life);
10) Healing of sick persons;
11) Power of duplication, etc.

For despicable little “Initiates”, confined in a small corner of the Created, that is not so bad!

But what is painful - and with which people play - is to oppose these possible faculties of the Mahatmas” to Christ’s virtues, to denounce them as incompatible, in order to succeed by “cultivated ignorance” to maintain the party spirit, instead of opening their arms to all men, without category or distinction!Though some be not ready for that universal embrace, we see that by limitation, being prejudiced, they try to impose it upon others.

O Astro (5--39) has estimated that in 1926, there still were in Japan 71,281 Buddhist temples frequented by 58,621,000 inhabitants.Where is Christianity in the Nippon Archipelago: according to La Luz del Porvenir which borrows the details from the great spiritualistic association Oomoto Internacia (in Esperanto), we believe now dissolved, and its leaders hunted down and incarcerated.Sixty years of evangelization by missionaries have succeeded in converting only 250,000 Japanese, a stable figure in spite of the enormous increase in population these last years.At the same time, new sects and religions with a Buddhist and Shintoist basis draw to themselves thousands and thousands of new believers:Oomoto, for instance, counts more believers than Christianity.

A man to all men must say:
Li-Tai-Pe was for China what Homer was for Greece and Ossian for Scotland.
Quan-Thánh-Đế-Quân was for China what Turenne was for France.
Buddha, LaoTze, Confucius were what They are and Thee, Thou, are a son of God as I am thy brother.Thy suffering is my suffering.Let my joy in being a son of God be thy joy in being my brother.

Buddha, LaoTze, Confucius were what they are and thou, and I, are sons of God.So as for Thee, thou art I and I am thee.If thou understandest that, afterwards thou shalt understand peace, harmony and the joy of being.
Home                                                                  [1]  [2]  [3]  [4]  [5] [6]  [7]  [8]

Không có nhận xét nào:

Đăng nhận xét